![]() |
Author: Anna Houston
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
The JMP 5.1 statistical package was used for the analysis of the falling head lined borehole. The data was entered to obtain cumualtive time in hours and change in water height (cm). A "Fit x by y" bivariate model was used to determine the steady state infiltration rate. This was obtained by ommiting the data not apart of the steady state infiltraion rate. An example on site C1. The points were excluded shown in red so a line could be fitted to obtain the steady state infiltration rate whereby the dracian flux can be obtained(q). The darcian flux is obtained from the gradiant of the line, in this example it is 0.174.
Once the darcian flux had been found the linerized equation is used to calculated Ksat
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The sub-surface saturated hydraluic conductivity of the cultivated area is extremely slow an average of 0.005 (cm/h) was obtained. The steady state infiltration rate was obtained after 20 hours for the three experiments indicating the soil in the subsurface is possibly compacted reducing the hydraulic conductivity. In Vertosols the hydraulic conductivity is moderate to slow, the clay content is possibly greater down the profile, decreasing the hydraulic conductivity. The subsoil in most cases nearly always have a lower hydraulic conductivity, due to the lower rates of biological activity therefor reducing the soil structure (NLWRA, 2001). The results in C3 indicate recording error, as the infiltrartion rates during two of the recording times were equal which we would not expect. This would possibly be due to the use of a ruler to record the water level. This slow rate of Ksat would be a problem in the field if there was heavy rainfall as flooding would occur and possibly cause waterlogging. However if the field is used for irrigation this would be ideal as the slow rate of permeabilty would be ideal as the plants would be able to use optimum amount of water, without excessive deep drainage.
Steady state infiltraion graphs
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The main issues encounted with this method is the smearing of the borehole with the auger, therefore the infiltration of the water would be hindred as the natural connectivity of the pores would be altered. When placing the lining in the bore spaces betweeen the bore and the lining may occur especially at the base causing lateral flow, this can be ommited if the lining is pushed hard in to the soil. Although this method is relatively cost effective and easy to use the accuracy of measuring the water depth with a ruler can certainly be improved. This was evident in cultivated site 3 where the measurements contained some outliers.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Amoozegar, A. Wilson, G. W Methods for measuring hydraulic
conductivity and drainage porosity. Agricultural drainage. American
Society of Agronomy,Madison, USA: 1999. 1149-1205. over 4 pp. Munoz-Carpena, R., Regalado, C.M., Alvarez-Benedi, J., Bartoli, F., 2002. Field evaluation of the new Philip-Dunne permeameter for measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity.Soil Science 167:9-24 National Land and Water Resource audit, 2001 http://audit.ea.gov.au/ANRA/agriculture/docs/national/Agriculture_ASRIS_shc.html Vanderlinden, K., Gabriels, D., Giraldez, J.V., 1998 Evaluation of infiltration measurements under olive trees in Cordoba. Soil and Tillage Research 48:303-315
|
||||||||||||||||||||||