Blended learning in the Masters
of Taxation Law course

Jenny Gage, Richard Vann, Celeste Black, Faculty of Law
Rob Ellis,
Institute for Teaching and Learning

   

Traditionally, the Corporate Tax Course takes a problem-based learning focus through its use of case studies. This focus ensures that students, who are mostly professionals, learn both the technical legal content but also develop problem-solving skills essential to the practice of tax law. A continuing difficulty for students in the Master of Laws Program is the quality of their case study preparation due to significant professional work commitments. The use of blended learning in postgraduate courses, as noted in Anne Forster’s discussion paper, where classroom attendance is supplemented with online learning facilities, can provide a great deal of flexibility for busy professionals. This has been the rationale for the way in which the Corporate Tax teaching team has been developing a blended learning approach. Its main purpose is to help students prepare for the complex issues identified in the case studies.

Developing Meaningful Online Learning Activities
The process of redeveloping the case studies to include meaningful online learning activities led to a review of the learning outcomes of the Unit of Study. The review recognised that students needed to develop a structural awareness of the changing landscape of taxation legislation, and that they would develop it best through a deeper understanding of the basic concepts underlying each case study.

The online learning activities scaffolded the basic concepts of the case studies through enquiry-based learning processes. To engage in these processes, students applied the relevant legislation, case extracts and rulings (linked to a html page in a useful online format by staff in the Fisher Library) to the case studies and then tested their understanding through online quizzes. Using this learning as a basis, their understanding of how the provisions related to the case studies was further developed through short answer questions where students posted answers to a discussion forum. In the seminars, the lecturer was able to pitch the level of the discussion in relation to the understanding the students revealed in the online quizzes, short answers and discussions.

A Few Key Issues
In addition to prompting a review of the student learning outcomes, the redevelopment of the case studies raised a number of issues for the teaching team.

Adopting a Student Perspective while Developing the Online Activities
To help students experience meaningful learning, the Corporate Tax teaching team adopted a student perspective in the design of online activities. In other words, the team needed to think about how the online materials might be designed to help students develop a structural awareness of the changing landscape of taxation legislation. The team's response to this issue came from an awareness of common misunderstandings or difficulties raised by past students about the case studies. This motivated the design and development of the quizzes and short answer questions. For example, students typically had difficulty understanding the taxation legislation related to franking accounts. To help students better understand the basic issues of franking accounts, a franking account interactive which embedded learning in an authentic context complemented the issues raised in the related quiz. It involved students completing the franking account within a framework that highlighted the taxation implications along the way.

Developing a Sustainable Learning and Teaching Strategy
The teaching team was concerned that the online learning preparation for seminars might also become unsustainable for all concerned if students had difficulty understanding its purpose. To help students understand the purpose of their online learning, a tutor took on the responsibility of supporting their needs. This support took a number of forms - a training session addressing online learning strategies was held at the beginning of the semester; a number of interstate students received telephone tuition on the use of the site, and ongoing queries about the purpose of the learning activities was typically dealt with through a bulletin board posting to the whole group. Technical support needs were dealt with by the University’s technical helpdesk. When compared with previous experience, the number of student queries about online learning was significantly reduced. Student feedback on the training sessions held at the end of the course suggested that the different forms of learning support were the reason for this.

Since the learning outcomes from the online activities provided impetus for the seminar discussions, communication between the tutor and the seminar lecturer about the outcomes of the quizzes and short answer questions was essential. The tutor and the lecturer worked together to summarise five or six main issues that emerged from the online activities, which warranted discussion at the seminar.

The Students’ Perspective on the Learning Experience
Over the past 12 months, students from both law firms and those located on-campus have provided feedback about their learning experiences in the Masters of Taxation Law. The questions explored the usefulness of the online activities for the seminar learning, students’ perceptions of the purpose of the online learning activities and the level of difficulty they associated with the online learning activities. The majority of students (n=44) felt that the online learning activities made them better prepared (86%); helped them to get more out of the face-to-face seminar than usual (70%), understood the purpose of the online learning activities (75%) and felt that the level of difficulty was about right (68%). Others thought the activities could be made more challenging. These results and comments indicate there is a variation in the learning experience. Future strategies to improve the online learning experience might include increasing the level of complexity for some of the activities and introducing others that will help the students to be more aware of their relationship to problem-solving in the seminars.

Jenny Gage and Celeste Black teach on the Masters of Taxation Law Program. Jenny leads the online development of the Corporate Taxation Unit. Professor Richard Vann coordinates the Masters of Taxation Law Program. Rob Ellis works in the Institute of Teaching and Learning.

This project has been supported by iTEV, WebMCQ and the Flexible Online Learning Project.Email: jennyg@law.usyd.edu.au

   
Return to Contents | About Synergy | Back Issues | Past Contributors | Bookshelf Index |
   

Copyright ©2002 Institute for Teaching and Learning